Effectively managing workplace conduct and implementing disciplinary procedures are crucial for maintaining a productive work environment. Malaysian employers must follow a structured approach to ensure compliance with employment law and uphold fairness. This article provides a comprehensive guide on handling workplace misconduct, outlining fair disciplinary procedures, and ensuring legal compliance based on Malaysian employment law.
Legal Framework and Compliance
The primary legislation governing employment in Malaysia includes the Employment Act 1955 and the Industrial Relations Act 1967. These acts outline the rights and obligations of employers and employees, including procedures for addressing workplace misconduct and unjust dismissal.
Step-by-Step Guide to Handling Misconduct
1. Identifying Misconduct:
Misconduct can range from minor issues like tardiness to serious offenses such as theft or fraud. Employers should have clear policies defining acceptable and unacceptable behavior.
2. Conducting an Investigation:
Promptly investigate any allegations of misconduct. Gather evidence, interview witnesses, and document findings to ensure a fair and impartial process.
3. Issuing a Show Cause Letter:
If the investigation supports the allegations, issue a show cause letter to the employee. This letter should outline the alleged misconduct and allow the employee to respond within a specified period.
4. Holding a Domestic Inquiry:
For serious misconduct, conduct a domestic inquiry. This is an internal hearing where evidence is presented, and the employee can defend themselves. Ensure the panel is impartial and proceedings are properly recorded.
5. Decision Making:
Based on the inquiry findings, decide on the appropriate disciplinary action. This can range from warnings to dismissal, depending on the severity of the misconduct. Ensure the action is fair and proportionate.
6. Implementation and Documentation:
Communicate the decision to the employee in writing, detailing the reasons for the disciplinary action. Maintain thorough documentation of all steps taken for future reference and compliance.
Ensuring Legal Compliance
To ensure disciplinary actions are legally compliant and uphold employee rights, consider the following:
1. Adherence to Natural Justice:
Ensure the disciplinary process is fair and unbiased. Employees must have a fair opportunity to present their case.
2. Reasonableness:
Disciplinary actions must be reasonable and consistent with company policies and past practices.
3. Timeliness:
Actions such as issuing show cause letters and conducting inquiries should be prompt to avoid undermining the process.
Addressing Unjust Dismissals
Under the Industrial Relations Act 1967, section 20(1A) provides that employees who believe they have been unjustly dismissed can file a representation to the Director General for Industrial Relations within 60 days of dismissal. The Director General will then facilitate a conciliation process to resolve the dispute. If unresolved, the matter may be referred to the Industrial Court.
Landmark Case: Fung Keong Rubber Manufacturing (M) Sdn Bhd v. Lee Eng Kiat & Ors [1980] 1 LNS 156 [FC]
In this landmark case, the Federal Court asserted that Director General does not have the discretion to allow application if they fail to be filed within 60 days of dismissal. Due to the foregoing reason, the case was dismissed.
An excerpt of the case is as follows:
"We cannot agree with the learned judge that it was for the Director-General to decide whether the claim was made within the time limit, and we think he went too far when he said that there was evidence for the Director-General to come to the conclusion that their claim was made within time. The determination of the issue whether the claim was made within the time limit involved mixed questions of law and fact for the industrial court, the fact being the ascertainment of the relevant conduct of the parties in pursuing their claim and the inferences proper to be drawn therefrom. Once that is ascertained, it is a question of law whether or not there was sufficient evidence that the claim was made in time. On the facts, we are of the view that the claim was presented well outside the time limit and that being so, it was for the Industrial Court to say that it was wrongly conferred with jurisdiction. In the circumstances it is open to this court to interfere with the exercise of the Minister's discretion in referring the matter to the Industrial Court. He had certainly exercised his discretion wrongly (see National Union of Hotel, Bar and Restaurant Workers v The Minister of Labour and Manpower [1980] 1 MLJ 189. If an error of law by the Industrial Court can be seen as a misconception of its own jurisdiction and therefore an absence of jurisdiction, this court assumes a free-wheeling power to interfere by way of prohibition whenever it appears to it that some error of law going to its jurisdiction has been made by the Industrial Court."
Conclusion
Effectively managing workplace conduct and disciplinary procedures is essential for maintaining a fair and productive work environment. By understanding the legal framework, conducting thorough investigations, and following fair procedures, Malaysian employers can handle misconduct appropriately and ensure compliance with employment law. Adherence to legal standards and seeking legal advice when necessary will help mitigate risks and protect the rights of both employers and employees.
Comments